Bit o’ Fun

Hey all

little off topic but a bit o’ fun none the less…

How would you be defined in a dictionary?

Warren Loorham —
[adjective]:Pretentiously academian

‘How will you be defined in the dictionary?’ at


3 Responses to “Bit o’ Fun”

  1. 1 Simon July 16, 2007 at 4:21 pm

    Hey Waz, I think that I prefer yours. I got:

    Simon Ives —
    A person of questionable sanity who starts their own cult.

    I don’t doubt the first part but that last bit is a lot to live up to!

  2. 2 Nathan July 16, 2007 at 11:59 pm

    Well, I think I have been defined quite accurately:

    Nathan Everson [noun]:A deadly strain of projectile vomit.

    Seems to sum up my philosophy quite well too!

  3. 3 Me August 6, 2007 at 1:24 am

    Yes, there is only one philosophy – the ‘Western’, ‘European’ or the ‘Continental’ – it has always been that way since this philosophy’s inception. ‘Analytical’ philosophy is a 20th century mishmash for less-than-mediocre liberal logic-mongers that has gotten out of hand.

    I take Kant as the benchmark – people who dont really get the Kantian message of criticism (and hence also what happens in German philosophy after Kant), and who then start philosophizing, become analytical philosophers. It is a form of retrogression!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 25,079 Encounters


Are you a contributor? Log In

%d bloggers like this: