10 Reasons Not to do Philosophy

What better way to start off this new philosophy blog for budding philosophy students than a post outlining why you should not do philosophy. Tony Lynch from the University of New England wrote this paper. Enjoy!

I am sure that most of you here think there are good reasons to
do philosophy. Certainly I can think of five good reasons.

In the first place I am certain that you all think that it is a good
thing to think; and, of course, philosophy just is the science or craft of

In the second place you are all going to go to university soon,
and as you perhaps know, universities are places where you are
supposed to learn to think. Thus it was that the first universities were
the philosophical academies of Plato and Aristotle; and even today a
university that lacks a philosophy department is simply an imposter.

In the third place you might have noticed that thinking lasts.
There is an aspect of the eternal in good thinking. And so it is that so
many of the universally known names of History – not only Plato and
Aristotle, but St Augustine, St Thomas Aquinas, Rene Descartes,
Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, George
Hegel, Soren Kierkegaard, Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich
Nietzsche, Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Martin
Heidegger,John Paul Sartre and Simone deBeuvoir – are all

In the fourth place you might just be consumed with curiosity
about the big issues. Is there a God? Are human beings free? Do
they have a mind that is more than the brain? Is anything really,
objectively, right or wrong? What is truth? What is knowledge?
What is Being? And where can these things be found? And so on.
And finally, and because as a philosopher you are a thinker par
excellence, you are very employable; for many employers know that
you don’t have to teach someone trained in philosophy how to think,
analyse, argue or write.

But let’s be careful, and let’s be fair. For there are reasons not
to do philosophy; and I think I ought to present some of them to you
before you make, what is, a momentous decision.

The first reason not to do philosophy is that it can be fatal. This
is no exaggeration, it is just a fact. The person we usually think of as
the founder of the whole shebang, Socrates, was executed by Athens
in 399 BC for practicing philosophy. He was, apparently, “corrupting
the youth” by encouraging them to ask smart arse questions of their
elders which they – as is often the case – found themselves illequipped
to answer. Understandably this upset them. Very much.
And so they took Drastic Action. So I warn you, smart arse questions
can get you into serious trouble.

The second reason not to do philosophy is precisely what led
Socrates to ask his dangerous questions in the first place. It
sensitizes you to bullshit. It gives you a thin skin when it comes to
nonsense, balderdash, blather, bunkum, claptrap, drivel, garbage,
idiocy, piffle, poppycock, rigmarole, rubbish, spin, tomfoolery, trash
and twaddle. And don’t think this is a good thing, or that others will
think it a good thing. After all we are surrounded by bullshit; it is,
probably, our major resource and our major product. Bullshit makes
the world go round; it oils the hinges of life; it enlivens the
conversational world; and it is available to everyone, free of charge.
To be sensitized to it is to be in a pitiable state. It is to be always
hurting, and always finding new ways to be hurt.

The third reason not do philosophy, like the first, concerns your
health. For even if you are not given the ultimate punishment for
asking smart arse questions of bullshit artists, still you will spend a lot
of time sitting, reading, thinking and writing. Your cardio-vascular
fitness will inevitably suffer, your behind will spread, and you will
squint. It can’t be helped. It’s just the way it is. And don’t believe all
that stuff about the sexiness of a beautiful mind. I mean who wants a
beautiful mind in a big bummed, squinting mess of palpitations, leg
swellings and fatigue?

The fourth reason not to do philosophy is aesthetic. Have a
good look at me. You see what I’m saying? Philosophers are not a
pretty bunch. In fact, the collective noun for a group of philosophers
is an ugly of philosophers. Yes, a philosopher may be good, or they
may be bad, but typically they will be ugly. Again this goes back to
the unfortunate Socrates. He had bug eyes, a bulging forehead, wing
nut ears and baboon nostrils. And get this – he liked looking like that!
Well, are you prepared to sign up to the ugly bunch?

The fifth reason not to do philosophy is that it will deform your
character. You will lose any shred of intellectual modesty. No-one
else’s work will ever be as good or as brilliant as yours. There is, in
fact, a unique mental disorder available only to philosophers. It is
that inferiority complex which leads you to think others work might
sometimes be as good as yours. Such a disorder is crippling, and I
hope you are not naïve enough to expect any sympathy for your
sufferings from your fellow philosophers.

The sixth reason not to do philosophy was pointed out by the
Monty Python boys. For some reason – perhaps connected with their
poor physical shape, their offensive looks, their sensitivity to bullshit,
and their lurking death wish – philosophers have a tendency to get
smashed, and – even worse – to take pride in getting smashed. As
by now you might suspect, Socrates lies at the heart of the problem.
In the Symposium he takes great pride in drinking all night and
drinking everyone else under the table. Hegel, of course, never once
approached sobriety; and you couldn’t prize the pint from
Wittgenstein’s hand. So if you value your liver, perhaps economics is
your cup of tea.

The seventh reason not to do philosophy – assuming you need
another, given your poor physical shape, your unfortunate
colleagues, your pitiful social skills and your alcohol problem – is that
you will not actually solve anything. With most jobs you finish
something. You draw up a set of plans, you build a house, you mow
your lawn, you build a better mouse trap – you start something and
you finish it. Then you put your feet up and feel proud of what you
have accomplished. Not in philosophy. In philosophy everything gets
started, but nothing is ever finished. We still don’t know if there is a
God or not; or if human beings are free. We don’t know whether the
mind is more than the brain, or whether there are objective moral
values. We still don’t know what truth, or knowledge or being are, or
where they are to be found.

The eight reason not to do philosophy is a matter of social
decorum. Philosophers are prone to talking to themselves. And not
just talking to themselves, but to arguing and haranguing themselves.
The reason for this is that because philosophy insists that thinking is
allowed, it follows – does it not? – that it is best done aloud. Of
course it is not all downside here. Sure people will eye you strangely
and edge away from you, but some of them will give you money “for a
cup of tea”, or “a bite to eat”. One of my former colleagues once
collected over $100 dollars in two hours in the Sydney mall. All by
sitting down and thinking aloud about the inner contradictions of the
Hegelian dialectic. But for all the upside, there is still the downside.
After all, there you are; a physically repulsive drunk mumbling to
yourself about incomprehensible matters reduced to begging in the
streets. Not so different, come to think of it, from what Socrates was
up to in Ancient Athens. And who can forget how he ended up?

The ninth reason not to do philosophy is that it is a proven
relationsip wrecker. I mean who would want to be in a relationship
with one in the first place? Who could possibly be expected to put up
with that mumbling, drooling, wreck, sitting all day at their desk and
working on a heart problem? Socrates wife, Xanthippe, refused to let
him into their house, on the grounds that not only was he an ugly
drunk, he just wouldn’t shut up. He argued about everything, she
said, and he always had to have the last word. At that moment,
legend has it, she emptied a chamber pot over his head, leading the
Master to remark that “After the thunder there generally falls rain”.

And so to the final, and tenth, reason for not doing philosophy.
It is this. After having brilliantly, and conclusively, stated your mind,
so that, as far as you are concerned, there is nothing more to be said,
you have to say something like this: Any questions?

Posted by Simon Ives


22 Responses to “10 Reasons Not to do Philosophy”

  1. 1 waz March 23, 2007 at 10:40 am

    Well I think I am getting there…

    My bum is spreading, my eyes are gettting narrower, I am drinking more, I am less concerned with the way I look, my relationships fail because I sit at a desk all night reading and writing, I have never been thicked skinned when it comes to bullshit, and as most of you are aware I like asking smart arse questions (and relevant ones as well).

    I am not sure of the ugly tag, I always think of myself in that vain, but others say I am not – make your own decision on that one and lastly I haven’t reached the stage where I think my work is better than anyone elses – in fact I don’t rate my work very high at all.


  2. 2 Nathan March 25, 2007 at 2:21 pm

    Imagine the grotesqueries one must be prepared to commit oneself to to be a ‘good’ philosopher.

  3. 3 Michael January 9, 2008 at 4:29 am

    Here are my responses to his arguments:

    1) When was the last time a philosopher was put to death? Additionally, academics of all disciplines have been persecuted at some point in history, so perhaps we should not risk being academics to begin with?

    2)It doesnt sensatize you to bullshit. Rather, what appears to be bullshit turns out not to be bullshit upon deeper reflection. The belief that there is no free will, for instance, seems like bullshit to anyone who has never reflected on the matter. But the evidence is in favor of determinism, at least in my mind.

    3)Philosophy professors live well above the average life-span, so how does this argument have any empirical support? The oppisite is true. Practice philosophy if you want to live a long life.

    4) Its true that philosophers are generally more ugly. However, if the author is implying that one BECOMES ugly for practicing philosophy, then the author is clearly an idiot. If Pam Anderson (the model, not the Pam Anderson who is a philosopher at Oxford) decided to study philosophy, I doubt it would “cause” her to become less attractive.

    5)You will lose any shred of intellectual modesty? Haha, last time I checked philosophers (along with other academics) suffered from “academic imposter syndrome”, which is the belief that one is a phoney and one’s work is never really good enough.

    6)True. But so what?

    7)Philosphy is solved lots of stuff. It is just that whatever gets solved generally move outside of philosophy. For instance, a philosopher coined the theory of “atomism” (now a scientific fact). And in terms of the whole “God” debate, for many this seems resolved. There are many more examples.

    I am too lazy to finish. But you get my drift.

  4. 4 Simon January 9, 2008 at 3:01 pm

    Hmmmm…. What do we call an ironic response to an ironic argument?

  5. 5 tony May 22, 2008 at 2:57 pm

    In my view the distance between an ironic argument and an ironic response is precisely that between a wit and a *wit

  6. 6 Simon May 22, 2008 at 3:05 pm

    hehe, good one Tony.

  7. 7 wiks April 21, 2011 at 9:47 am

    he forgot to mention the almost unbearable sadness that comes with dualistic thinking

  8. 8 Reuben May 9, 2013 at 3:34 pm

    You might need heavier line and tackle to account for powerful river flows.

    You will also want to have a supply of different lines that you can use.

    Yet sometimes a net is better to use because it usually doesn’t harm the fish and will most likely be easier for you to prepare the fish for later.

  9. 9 sleepy hollow ny August 9, 2013 at 6:38 am

    Hi there, I discovered your site by the use of Google while looking for a similar topic, your web site got here up, it appears good.
    I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, simply was alert to your blog through Google, and found that it’s truly informative.
    I’m gonna be careful for brussels. I will appreciate when you continue this in future. Numerous other folks can be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

  10. 10 The Best Iphone 4S Deals September 18, 2013 at 4:35 pm

    Thank you for any other fantastic post. Where else may anybody get that type of
    info in such a perfect method of writing?
    I have a presentation next week, and I’m on the look for such information.

  11. 11 beep.com September 26, 2013 at 6:32 pm

    I’d like to find out more? I’d care too find outt more details.

  12. 12 nerf rebelle heartbreaker September 30, 2013 at 8:32 am

    I have been surfing online more than 2 hours today, yet I never
    found any interesting article like yours. It’s pretty worth enough
    for me. In my view, if all web owners and bloggers made good
    content as you did, the internet will be much more useful
    than ever before.

  13. 13 rheem water heater October 1, 2013 at 2:03 am

    I think tnis is one of the most important information for me.
    Andd i’m glad reading your article. But wanna remark on few general things,
    The web site style is perfect, the articles is really excellent :
    D. Good job, cheers

  14. 14 Wedding Venue Buckinghamshire April 18, 2014 at 2:19 am

    This can happen to the best of us so I don’t blame you but here are a couple of things you
    should keep in mind as you start looking at wedding venues so you don’t
    get locked into something that might not be your best option.
    If you happen to get an all-inclusive package then most likely you don’t
    have to work on anything anymore. There are several ideas
    you can use in this area that work well at a wedding venue:
    Fill a large vase with marshmallows and use the marshmallows as a stand for artificial flowers – or continue the theme and stick
    large lollipops in the marshmallows instead.

  15. 15 Simone November 5, 2014 at 1:12 pm

    Your arguments are pretty shallow. It is quite apparent that you’re not very well-versed on such a discipline.

  16. 16 thisisaqualityblog January 5, 2015 at 1:23 am

    You’re clearly not too knowledgeable on the subject – how could Socrates be thought of as the founder of philosophy, when he was a student of Plato, a philosopher? hmmm

  17. 18 Austin Hernandez May 17, 2015 at 1:25 pm

    This writer sounds very ignorant.

  18. 19 H M May 24, 2015 at 6:20 pm

    Thankyou. I’ve decided not to do philosophy, and it is just this I’ve been looking for. Put into words the trouble with the discipline! In saying that, all the best. And au revoir!

  19. 20 Fuck you January 8, 2016 at 2:25 pm

    Get a life loser

  20. 21 tripps33 May 25, 2016 at 11:27 pm

    I’m just wondering, were you being serious with this article. Some of it made me laugh. If it was meant to be a joke then I found it funny but if you were being serious, then you clearly do not know what it is to be a philosopher.

  21. 22 voyant chalons en champagne March 24, 2019 at 6:44 am

    Hello to ɑll, thе contents existing ɑt tһіs site are actսally amazing
    for people knowledge, ѡell, keeр up the good work fellows.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog Stats

  • 26,508 Encounters


Are you a contributor? Log In

%d bloggers like this: